
18 yr old girl with ankle pain for 15 years. open biopsy done 10 years ago was reported as nonspecific. She had rest pain. Xrays showed consider narrowing of the joint space as well as osteophytes. The plan was arthroscopic ankle fusion. I have performed 14 of these and all united within 6 weeks except one where in resulted in a nonunion (gross deformity was the reason). Due to severe fibrous ankylosis of the joint one could not enter the notch of Harty or ankle. One had to identify the anterior joint with great difficulty. I was on the anterior tibia and walked down under IMI control as there was no joint space to enter. Using osteotomes the joint was entered, scar removed with small curreted and arthrodesed with 2 converging tibitalar 6.5 mm cannulated cancelous Screws.

The biopsy was done 15 years ago and reported as nonspecific synovitis. Xrays- 6 degrees plantar flexion,neutral varus/valgus.
We unfortunately did not biopsy this time. As far as Sunjays comment goes. You are spot on. One cannot correct deformity with arthroscopic ankle fusion and the only failure I had with a arthroscopic ankle fusion is a deformed ankle(1/ 14). As far getting into the ankle is concerned, it is best done with ankle in dorsiflexion, no traction, direct trocar medial to lateral after entering into the capsule at the AM portal (Notch of Harty) in the coronal plane and look posteriorly to identify the joint. The clea8vage even in fibrous ankylosis is visible, if not the under x ray control using a quarter inch osteotome one could identify the same and work posteriorly with osteotome, currettes and vapr etc before fusing it. Long term secondary OA is expected when in further fusion may be needed. TER at this age is not advisable.
Bimal, 1.
The morbidity is less. The patient is home the next day comfortable. The oedema and pain post op in open lasts for a long time.
2. The union rates after scopic fusion is much higher above 95% and even the duration to fusion is less.
the xrays are uploaded for comments